WORK
What has been completed?
Separate drafted, approved, published, and verified work.
Reporting example
Know what changed. Know what still needs work.
A useful progress review connects completed work to observed changes and the next decision.
DEMONSTRATION · NO CLIENT DATA
Sample reportYour progress, in one place.
Illustrative monthly review · Search reputation
The workflow examples below are fictional. They show how a progress review could be organized, not an actual client result, live dashboard or promised outcome.
Work completed
- Professional biographyPublished
- Profile informationUpdated
- Search baselineRecorded
Each item would link to the approved asset and completion record in your agreed report.
Search visibility
BaselineAgreed queries & sources
Current reviewComparable observations
Record the query, date, location and observed position. Separate published content from confirmed indexing and ranking movement.
Still needs attention
- New article draftApproval needed
- Publisher correction requestAwaiting reply
- New professional pageIndexing to verify
Next actions
- Client: review the draft and confirm factual details.
- RR: follow up on the correction request.
- RR: repeat agreed searches and report remaining exposure.
An example of the reporting structure.
Illustrative reporting format only. This example contains no client data, campaign results, or performance forecast.
| Area | Baseline records | Each review records | What it helps you decide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search visibility | Agreed query, URL, date, location, and observed position | Comparable position and changes in sources | Whether exposure has changed on the agreed searches |
| Professional content | Existing assets and identified gaps | Drafted, approved, published, and indexed states | Which work is complete and what needs approval |
| Privacy exposure | Covered sources with matching listings | Found, requested, confirmed, or reappeared | Which listings still require follow-up |
| Reviews & listings | Locations, profile accuracy, and response coverage | Verified updates, response activity, and trends | Where local teams need attention |
Every review should answer three questions.
CHANGE
What is different from baseline?
Compare the agreed searches, sources, and exposure measures.
NEXT
What happens next?
Identify remaining concerns, dependencies, approvals, and priorities.
Privacy reporting from our partner.
DeleteMe publishes its own sample report. It illustrates the provider’s reporting format and is separate from Reputation Repair’s reporting framework.
View DeleteMe’s sample reportYour situation deserves a specific plan.
Tell us what people find online and what you want to change.